Communications with Pitt
Although the chancellor of Pitt and his administrators have received
numerous communications from our grassroots movement since we began in
2007 to resolve the many university related problems in our community,
we have not received a single page of correspondence
from the chancellor,
and only around 10 pages collectively from all the members of his administration.
Below are two of the numerous correspondences that have been sent to
the chancellor.
The following letter was sent to Pitt Chancellor Mark Nordenberg on
March 1, 2009. The request for funding of The SOUL Program continues
to be denied.
“To Chancellor Mark Nordenberg:
There is a student grassroots movement emerging at the University of
Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University that is in solidarity with
the grassroots movement of the long-time residents of South Oakland.
The focus of these movements is the implementation of THE SOUL PROGRAM.
My letter to you on February 22, 2009 outlined clearly how the program
would be implemented. The only component missing is a commitment and
a deeper caring of our community from you and Mr. Jeffrey Romoff to provide
funding for this program.
For the past two years the elderly long-time residents of South Oakland
have too often heard the words “we have no money” from
you and Mr. Jeffrey Romoff when we have asked for support to end the
problems of litter and trash in our community.
We deserve to live in a clean and healthy environment. We believe our
request for funding of THE SOUL PROGRAM is justified when the following
are considered:
1) In December 2008, the university gave a 10-year,
$4.9 million dollar,
commitment to a Greensburg developer (which has no ties to our community)
to rent office space at a site that was once a restaurant in North Oakland.
The developer had paid $2.2 million dollars for
the site. That same month
UPMC denied our request for $30,000 in seed money for THE SOUL PROGRAM.
2) The University of Pittsburgh, on Form 990 (Return of Organization
Exempt from Income Tax), for the last three years had
an average yearly surplus of $190 million dollars.
3) The university has a $2.4 billion dollar
endowment.
4) In a memo to your staff a few months ago, you wrote to them that
there was record-breaking fundraising in the past year.
5) An article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette last week stated that
on February 2 the university sent $5 million
dollars to an investment
firm that has possibly defrauded the university out of tens of millions
of dollars. To the best of my knowledge, in Pitt’s 100-year history
in Oakland, that amount has never been invested in the residential
community.
6) UPMC has earned well over a billion dollars in
profit for the past
three years.
7) We sense that an in-depth financial investigation of Pitt and UPMC
by the national or local media would reveal even greater surpluses and
profits than what any of us now know. And such an investigation also
may show more financial waste.
8) No other community in the city of Pittsburgh has been as adversely
impacted by the presence of Pitt and UPMC than that of South Oakland.
Instead of you and Mr. Romoff asking the long-time residents “What
more can we do for you,” the two of you have denied our request
for assistance to improve our quality of life.
In light of all of the above, and most of all because elderly long-time
residents have suffered long enough, we are making the following affordable
and reasonable request:
We are asking for a 10-year, $1.2 million dollar,
commitment of $120,000 per year by Pitt and UPMC for THE SOUL PROGRAM. This amount will allow
YouthPlaces and Peoples Oakland to hire ten youths at a salary for each
of $10,000 per year. The additional amount of $20,000 would go towards
beautification projects and other environmental causes in South Oakland
which our residents and student supporters would agree to implement.
The community of South Oakland deserves no less.
You and Mr. Romoff certainly have freedom of choice to stonewall, ignore
or deny our request and if so, the grassroots movements of long-time
residents and students will initiate a petition
drive, both locally and
nationally to gather further support for our just cause.
Too many long-time residents of South Oakland have
died without experiencing
a new environment under the leadership of you and Jeffrey Romoff. That
tragedy must end. Expansion and the earning of billions of dollars must
never take precedence over human dignity. ENOUGH is ENOUGH!
Sincerely,
Carlino Giampolo”
Note: Pitt and UPMC have refused any financial support for the SOUL Program.
The following letter was hand delivered to Chancellor Mark Nordenberg
on Oct. 18, 2010.
“Chancellor Mark Nordenberg:
Once again, I am bringing to your attention the very serious issue
of the University of Pittsburgh’s 2010 fireworks display, which
is scheduled to take place from Mazeroski Field.
The first firework explosion from last year’s display awakened
my 90+ year-old parents from their usual deep sleep and caused me to
jump off of the living room couch, unsure if a bomb had gone off in
the street. The sound of the exploding fireworks for the next 20 minutes
reverberated through my body. If it rattled me, I can only imagine
what my parents, who are of advanced age and have weaker constitutions,
must have felt. It was a harrowing experience, and I hope that my parents
and I never need to suffer through that terror again.
My parents stayed in their bed for 20 minutes, waiting for the fireworks
display to end. The exploding firebombs have very serious potential health
consequences including: the sudden burst of noise from exploding shells
can adversely affect the function of the heart, and the loudness of the
booms can lead to hearing loss.
You are knowingly and willingly ignoring the very serious health risks
to the residents and numerous hospital patients in our neighborhood.
Your own interests are deemed far more important than the health, safety
and well-being of the residents and hospital patients.
In addition, ash from the exploding firebombs has landed on rooftops
and in the yards of neighbors. How could you choose a fireworks display
site that is within 300 feet of residential homes and an adjacent tree-filled
hillside? That hillside and nearby homes can easily catch on fire endangering
the lives of residents. Do you care? Also, those fireworks traumatize
animals in the neighborhood. No cruelty is justifiable.
It is clearly illegal to launch fireworks from Mazeroski Field.
You are avoiding responsibility for this fireworks display by stating
that the City of Pittsburgh Department of Public Safety and the City
of Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire have given their approval of this event
in past years. Although it is true that the city must be held accountable
for allowing this event to occur, you are responsible for initiating
this event and doing nothing to prevent it, despite claims that point
to its potential dangerousness. I am putting you on notice that should
there be a medical emergency concerning my parents as a result of this
event, civil charges will be made against you.
Several weeks ago (and the following event can be verified by Pitt
Police Officer Ron Bennett) a student told a long-time resident; “This
is a campus neighborhood. If you don’t like it, then move.” This
occurred when the resident asked students to keep their volume down during
a drunken party. Your attitude is very similar to the student's. By your
inaction, you are implicitly telling my parents that if they don’t
like the fireworks, then they should leave their home and return when
it is over.
But my parents will not leave their home. They intend to keep their
dignity. My 94-year old father was born and raised in this neighborhood
and lived here his entire life, with the exception of the four years
he spent fighting for our country in the Second World War. My mother
has been here for 68 of her 90 years. They didn’t ask for this
fireworks display to take place in our neighborhood, and they will
not stand by as helpless victims.
Attached is a petition signed by twenty-one long-time residents of
Panther Hollow. You will note that the majority of them are between
the ages of 71 to 94 years. All of us are speaking to you with one
voice and one message – move the fireworks display to another
venue outside of Oakland.
Sincerely,
Carlino Giampolo
Note: Chancellor Mark Nordenberg refused to move the fireworks display, and it continues as of August
2019.
|